So, expenses: Tories vs Labour, who wins?!

Wednesday, 10th June 2009 at 11:37 UTC 2 comments

What struck me the whole way through the expenses claims scandal is that its actually rather unfair that this is coming down on Gordon Brown, a Labour politician. I think this bares worth a little explaining and underlining. Expenses have been abused by both sides, but what of the actual trends in abuse?

Lets think of the kinds of things that Labour MP’s have claimed for when they shouldn’t. Most of it involves redecorating as far as I can see. Everyone needs wallpaper, its just they should have paid for it themselves and not on expenses.

This isn’t to let them off the hook, but actually, most of the abuses are quite reasonable spends. None of us would disagree that a house needs redecorating once in a while; you should see the improvement it made to my parent’s hall way to be repainted after 3 years. Its mostly run-of-the-mill house repairs and flipping of second homes to get the most money. Looking through the list, there are occasional flashes of opulence, but in the main, these are things people should have paid out of their own earnings.

Now, lets ask the same of the Tories. Duck ponds, cleaning the moat, other gardening expenses which seem to redefine a Kingdom as a Garden. Servants and maids. So much of what the Tories claim seems to be overtly a way of displaying wealth, of keeping up with the Jones’s in Big Business with whom they seem to be even more chummy than Labour appears.

The Labour list leaves me asking “What counts as an expense?”, the Tory list leaves me wondering “What counts as a reasonable use of money?”. As someone who is very much behind the aspiration to simple living, the Tory expenses revolt me more by some way. That’s not an attempt to claim I’m doing well on simple living, by the way, I still spend money on things I really don’t need and have things I should really prioritise instead that I’ve put off buying as a result of overspends.

But I think the question might be better asked: which of these expenses claims could be construed as “sustainable”? I think it would be a much more valuable debate than the current mud-slinging that is going on. Any thoughts, please send them via the comments below.


Entry filed under: Conservatives, Economics, Labour Party, Party Politics, Politics, Sustainability.

Refusing to be defeated by the BNP Odds and Ends

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Helen  |  Wednesday, 10th June 2009 at 18:26 UTC

    What upsets me most about the expenses scandal is the way that Cameron seems to believe the Tories have got away with it despite the vast amount of news coverage about expenses abuse by Tory MPs, and what’s more, no one seems to be challenging him on that assumption. I mean, the Tories aren’t in power and Labour are so the Tories are ok? WTF? It’s like there are two emporers with no clothes but the press is all “OMG NAKED GORDON BROWN!!!!”

    Sorry, so irritated by the whole thing I have to resort to netspeak.

  • 2. Duck  |  Saturday, 13th June 2009 at 12:21 UTC

    The Russian Embassy was full of MPs discussing expenses with one another. If only I actually watched TV / paid attention to visual media / was better at face-recognition, could have been interesting. As was mostly watched parakeets. Parakeets FTW!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

My Twitter Updates

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Blog Stats

  • 77,913 visits

Copyright Info